Mamata in Supreme Court: A Big Game Exposed

Key Highlights

1. Mamata Banerjee personally argued her case in the Supreme Court, creating strong political optics.
2. She claimed  that the Election Commission is misusing the SIR process mainly to delete voter names.
3. She claimed that the ECI is targeting only West Bengal, but the fact of life remains higher exclusions in Uttar Pradesh and Gujarat.
4. Mamata Alleged that micro-observers from BJP-ruled states are deleting names from offices.
5. Mamata argued that SIR is a time-taken process and unnecessary rush into two months is causing public harassment.
6. Critics countered that digital systems and artificial intelligence naturally reduce time.
7. Questions emerged over the role of high-profile lawyers despite Mamata arguing herself.
8. The absence of opposition and INDIA Alliance leaders beside her drew attention.
9. The episode highlighted a sharp contrast between rights-based rhetoric and ground realities.

Read More

Feb 05, 2026 - By Ashutosh Roy Current AffairsPolitics

Why ED vs CM Case Turned Vibrant? Exclusive

Courtroom chaos, ED allegations, and political power clash on January 09, 2026 in Kolkata. An in-depth analysis is here why the ED vs CM case turned explosive.

Jan 11, 2026 - By Ashutosh Roy Current AffairsPolitics

Mamata vs Election Commission: Critical now

Discover the truth behind the Mamata vs Election Commission conflict on voter roll revision for deployment of micro observers. Get the expert perspective now.

Dec 23, 2025 - By Ashutosh Roy Current AffairsPolitics