Problems with Instructor led training system

If we go down through the memory lane, our school days become clearly visible, where a teacher is writing on the blackboard and the students have started whispering between themselves.

The oldest and most practiced method of training system is Instructor Led Training system, where the students sit on one side of the table and the instructor sits on the opposite and the book lying on the table bridge the gap.

People are irresistibly drawn to critics and it is their usual habit to show disrespect to the existing system. Even with due respect all the instructors at large, we are forced to state that the students show their interest to attend classes of some teachers and find out excuses to escape the classes of some other teachers.

If we can demonstrate the guts to call a spade as a spade, we must tell that the difference in attitude of the same student is caused by the humane factors of the two concerned teachers.

Any prevailing education system is primarily based on Instructor Led Training system, where the human factor of the teachers counts a lot to the students. Some teacher really attracts the students, while some others repel them.

Any system, where the human factor works as a variable factor can never bring a full proof universal output.

A human being may be bored and start making silly mistakes while adding in the balance sheet, but a calculator or computer hardly fails. The reason behind such accurate result is the absence of human beings inside the calculator or the CPU of the computer. The day has come, when other training methodologies are to be tested and may have to give preferences than the conventional Instructor Led training system.